Home » ACC 543B Compt 1

ACC 543B Compt 1

Competency Assessment Title: Net Present and Internal Rate of Return

Assignment Directions

Review the scenario and complete the activity below. This scenario can also be found in the “Problems – Series A” section 10-19A of Ch. 10,

“Planning for Capital Investments” of Fundamental Managerial Accounting Concepts.

Dwight Donovan, the president of Donovan Enterprises, is considering 2 investment opportunities. Because of limited resources, he will be able to

invest in only one of them.

Project A is to purchase a machine that will enable factory automation; the machine is expected to have a useful life of four years and no salvage

value. Project B supports a training program that will improve the skills of employees operating the current equipment. Initial cash expenditures for

Project A are $400,000 and for Project B are $160,000. The annual expected cash inflows are $126,000 for Project A and $52,800 for Project B.

Both investments are expected to provide cash flow benefits for the next four years. Donovan Enterprises’ desired rate of return is 8 percent. Your

task, as Senior Accountant, is to use your knowledge of net present value and internal rate of return to identify the preferred method and best

investment opportunity for the company and present your results to Dwight Donovan.

Use Excel®—showing all work and formulas—to compute the following:

The net present value of each project. Round your computations to 2 decimal points.

  • The approximate internal rate of return for each project. Round your rates to 6 decimal points.
  • Create a presentation showing the comparison of the net present value approach with the internal rate of return approach that you
  • calculated.

    Complete the following in your presentation:

    Analyze the results of the net present value calculations and the significance of these results, supported with examples.

  • Determine which project should be adopted based on the net present value approach and provide rationale for your decision.
  • Analyze the results of the internal rate of return calculation and the significance of these results, supported with examples.
  • Determine which project should be adopted based on the internal rate of return approach and provide rationale for your decision.
  • Determine the preferred method in the given circumstances and provide reasoning and details to support the method selected.
  • Synthesize results of analyses and computations to determine the best investment opportunity to recommend to the president of Donovan
  • Enterprises and provide rationale for your recommendation.
  • ACCCB/543 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
    Course Title: Managerial Accounting and Legal Aspects of Business
    Competency Assessment Title: Net Present and Internal Rate of Return
    Assignment Directions
    Review the scenario and complete the activity below. This scenario can also be found in the “Problems – Series A” section 10-19A of Ch. 10,
    “Planning for Capital Investments” of Fundamental Managerial Accounting Concepts.
    Dwight Donovan, the president of Donovan Enterprises, is considering 2 investment opportunities. Because of limited resources, he will be able to
    invest in only one of them.
    Project A is to purchase a machine that will enable factory automation; the machine is expected to have a useful life of four years and no salvage
    value. Project B supports a training program that will improve the skills of employees operating the current equipment. Initial cash expenditures for
    Project A are $400,000 and for Project B are $160,000. The annual expected cash inflows are $126,000 for Project A and $52,800 for Project B.
    Both investments are expected to provide cash flow benefits for the next four years. Donovan Enterprises’ desired rate of return is 8 percent. Your
    task, as Senior Accountant, is to use your knowledge of net present value and internal rate of return to identify the preferred method and best
    investment opportunity for the company and present your results to Dwight Donovan.
    Use Excel®—showing all work and formulas—to compute the following:
    • The net present value of each project. Round your computations to 2 decimal points.
    • The approximate internal rate of return for each project. Round your rates to 6 decimal points.
    Create an 8- to 10-slide presentation showing the comparison of the net present value approach with the internal rate of return approach that you
    calculated.
    Complete the following in your presentation:








    Analyze the results of the net present value calculations and the significance of these results, supported with examples.

      Determine which project should be adopted based on the net present value approach and provide rationale for your decision.
      Analyze the results of the internal rate of return calculation and the significance of these results, supported with examples.
      Determine which project should be adopted based on the internal rate of return approach and provide rationale for your decision.
      Determine the preferred method in the given circumstances and provide reasoning and details to support the method selected.
      Synthesize results of analyses and computations to determine the best investment opportunity to recommend to the president of Donovan
      Enterprises and provide rationale for your recommendation.

    Include detailed speaker notes.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    ACCCB/543 Competency 1 Rubric
    Page 2 of 3
    Competency Assessment Rubric
    Assignment/Performance
    Criteria
    Mastery
    100%
    Meets Expectations
    85%
    Not Met
    0%
    1. Computations
    (weight 30%)
    Showed formulas, formulas were
    completely correct, showed all
    calculation details, and
    calculations were completely
    correct, resulting in completely
    accurate interpretations.
    Showed formulas, formulas were
    partially correct, showed some
    calculation details and
    calculations are partially correct
    resulting in inaccurate
    interpretations.
    Showed formulas, formulas were not
    correct, showed some calculation details
    and calculations are not correct resulting in
    inaccurate interpretations or did not show
    formulas or did not show calculation
    details.
    2. Net Present Analysis
    (weight 8%)
    Thoroughly analyzed results of
    the net present value calculation;
    showed the significance of
    results from a creative and
    innovative perspective; examples
    thoroughly supported the
    analysis.
    Partially analyzed results of the
    net present value calculation;
    partially showed the significance
    of results; examples mostly
    supported analysis.
    Narrowly analyzed results of the net
    present value calculation; narrowly showed
    significance of results; examples minimally
    supported analysis or did not analyze the
    results of the net present value calculation;
    did not analyze significance of results; did
    not include examples to support analysis.
    3. Net Present Value
    Approach Decision
    (weight 8%)
    Determined which project should
    be adopted based on the new
    present value approach and
    provided a thorough, creative,
    and innovative rationale to
    support decision.
    Determined which project should
    be adopted based on the new
    present value approach and
    provided a partial rationale to
    support decision.
    Determined which project should be
    adopted based on the new present value
    approach and provided a narrow rationale
    to support decision or did not determine
    which project should be adopted based on
    the new present value approach or did not
    provide a rationale to support decision.
    4. Internal Rate of Return
    Analysis
    (weight 8%)
    Thoroughly analyzed the results
    of the internal rate of return
    calculation; showed the
    significance of results from a
    creative and innovative
    perspective; examples
    thoroughly supported analysis.
    Partially analyzed the results of
    the internal rate of return
    calculation; partially showed the
    significance of results; examples
    mostly supported analysis.
    Narrowly analyzed results of the internal
    rate of return calculation; narrowly showed
    the significance of results; examples
    partially supported analysis or did not
    analyze results of the internal rate of return
    calculation; did not analyze significance of
    results; did not provide examples to
    support analysis.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    ACCCB/543 Competency 1 Rubric
    Page 3 of 3
    Assignment/Performance
    Criteria
    Mastery
    100%
    Meets Expectations
    85%
    Not Met
    0%
    5. Internal Rate of Return
    Approach Decision
    (weight 8%)
    Determined which project should
    be adopted based on the internal
    rate of return approach and
    provided a thorough, creative,
    and innovative rationale to
    support decision.
    Determined which project should
    be adopted based on the internal
    rate of return approach and
    provided a partial rationale to
    support decision.
    Determined which project should be
    adopted based on the internal rate of
    return approach and provided a narrow
    rationale to support decision or did not
    determine which project should be adopted
    based on the internal rate of return
    approach or did not provide a rationale to
    support decision.
    6. Preferred Method
    Decision
    (weight 18%)
    Determined the preferred method
    for the given circumstances and
    provided thorough, creative, and
    innovative reasons and details to
    support decision.
    Determined the preferred method
    for the given circumstances and
    provided partial reasons and
    details to support decision.
    Determined preferred method for given
    circumstances and provided narrow
    reasons and details to support decision or
    did not determine preferred method for
    given circumstances or did not provide
    reason and details to support decision.
    7. Best Investment
    Opportunity
    Recommendation
    (weight 20%)
    Thoroughly synthesized the
    results of analyses and
    computations from a creative and
    innovative perspective to
    determine the best investment
    opportunity to recommend to the
    president of Donovan
    Enterprises.
    Partially synthesized the results
    of analyses and computations to
    determine the best investment
    opportunity to recommend to the
    president of Donovan
    Enterprises.
    Narrowly synthesized the results of
    analyses and computations to determine
    the best investment opportunity to
    recommend to the president of Donovan
    Enterprises or did not synthesize the
    results of analyses and computations to
    determine the best investment opportunity
    to recommend to the president of Donovan
    Enterprises.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

    Place your order
    (550 words)

    Approximate price: $22

    Calculate the price of your order

    550 words
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
    Total price:
    $26
    The price is based on these factors:
    Academic level
    Number of pages
    Urgency
    Basic features
    • Free title page and bibliography
    • Unlimited revisions
    • Plagiarism-free guarantee
    • Money-back guarantee
    • 24/7 support
    On-demand options
    • Writer’s samples
    • Part-by-part delivery
    • Overnight delivery
    • Copies of used sources
    • Expert Proofreading
    Paper format
    • 275 words per page
    • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
    • Double line spacing
    • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

    Our guarantees

    Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
    That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

    Money-back guarantee

    You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

    Read more

    Zero-plagiarism guarantee

    Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

    Read more

    Free-revision policy

    Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

    Read more

    Privacy policy

    Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

    Read more

    Fair-cooperation guarantee

    By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

    Read more