Request same writer from #110736Eric DavisModule 3 Session Long ProjectLED520 Cross-Cultural Communication and LeadershipDr. Kyle Steadham September 13, 2021Assessing your StereotypesWhat was the score for your own group? For the other group?The total score for my group was 19, while the total score for the other group was 18.What did the “Assessing Your Stereotypes” self-assessment reveal about the stereotypes you hold about your own and the other culture?The self-assessment revealed that I have a moderately favorable stereotype about my group. In particular, I have a moderately favorable stereotype about my group’s intelligence. Secondly, I feel that my group tends to be highly aggressive, which is moderately favorable. Their aggressiveness is not to be confused with aggression in the context of violence but aggressive in that they know what they want and are relentless to get it despite the obstacles. Thirdly, I find my group’s ability to be alert in the sense that they can sense danger and quickly respond to avert it to be highly favorable. At the same time, I feel that my group can sometimes be impulsive, which I take a neutral stance. Perhaps, because they have been marginalized for a long time, my group tends to have less hope for the future and become impulsive. Lastly, I feel that my group has a neutral stance on pleasure-loving. Some people still hold on to their traditions and take great pleasure partaking in activities that stimulate senses, such as singing and dancing.On the other culture, the self-assessment revealed that I have a moderately favorable stereotype, which is also slightly higher than my group. I feel the other group is moderately intelligent. Secondly, I feel that the other group’s tendency to be conservative to be more favorable. However, I find their level of shrewdness to be very unfavorable. Probably, this is informed by my measure of intelligence and perception about passing judgment. Additionally, I have a neutral stance towards the other group’s slyness, while I find it highly favorable that they are tradition-loving.How can the concept of social identity be used to explain your scores?The social identity theory by Henri Tajfel is about an individual’s sense of who they are based on their group membership. Henri argued that the groups an individual associated were a significant source of pride and self-esteem and provided a sense of belonging. Tajfel proposed that stereotyping is a normal cognitive process, which tends to exaggerate the similarities and differences in groups. According to McLeod (2008), categorization is normal and people often categorize others to understand them better. It is impossible to function in a social context without categorizing people. However, an extreme prejudiced view towards a certain group may result in racism or discrimination. In this case, I have a very unfavorable stance towards the other group’s shrewdness. If left unchecked, this may become a source of discrimination/bias. At the same time, using the social comparison stage, when two groups become rivals, they are likely to start competing for the members to maintain their self-esteem. In my case, my group scored higher than the other group, which implies that it could develop into prejudice if left unchecked.What other insights have you gained about stereotypes from this questionnaire, the readings, and other aspects of the course so far that will be valuable to you in leading across different cultures?I realized that it is impossible not to categorize people. At the same time, categorizing people does not imply that one is prejudiced against them. Rather, it is a normal cognitive process that helps us function in a social world. Social identification is part of the normal social world. For instance, it is impossible not to categorize people in a group such as students, teachers, and workers. At the same time, the questionnaire taught me that it is very easy to develop prejudices towards other people. In that case, while categorizing people is inevitable, we should be careful not to let it turn into prejudice.ReferencesMcLeod, S. (2008). Social identity theory. Simply Psychology. http://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more