Home » FIN 306 Individual Project

FIN 306 Individual Project

Part 1: Structured External Assignment

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Assumption:You areafinancial analyst working for a major investment house. You have been given a major corporation (actually it’s your choice*) to analyze for its investment potential. You will choose a U.S. publicly traded retail or manufacturing company. It must have inventory. Choose something you are interested in if you can. The company choice will be submitted by the end week 2 in a discussion board. Only one person can choose each company so please review peer submissions before you make your choice.

You CANNOT choose the following as they are provided as examples: Wal-Mart, Dell or Ford.

*Do NOT choose a financial organization, stay with manufacturing or retail companies that are publicly traded.

Company Choice: SEPHORA

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

– A link to Sephora’s Annual Report:

DE&I Annual Report & Racial Bias in Retail Study – Sephora Newsroom

Competitor: ULTA Beauty, Inc

– Link to Ulta’s Annual Reports: Annual Reports :: Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)

Assignment: Based on your analysis of the firm’s financial statements and any relevant supplementary information you can obtain about the firm and its operating environment. Identify areas in which the company is performing well (strengths) and advise your boss of any problem areas (weaknesses).

Include in your analysis an assessment of how the firm’s strengths and weaknesses affect its credit worthiness and investment potential.

Data:The time period for the analysis should include a minimum of three full years (five is better) plus interim statements for the most recent year. In addition to the financial statements and other material in the annual and/or 10K reports, you should review relevant materials from other sources mentioned in class or found in your text. You will need to annual reports to get three years of information.

For comparison data use whomever you consider to be your major competitor. This means you will need their annual report as well to do the analysis for them.

Remember – your must usebothfinancial ratios and a common-sized income statements. You must show the formula, calculation and answer for all ratios.

Outline for PowerPoint Presentation:

The attached outline is provided for guidance, but the analysis should be adjusted, as appropriate, to conform to the individual characteristics of the firm. The categories listed in the outline should be included. If you have something you cannot find, before ignoring it, send an email to ask.

Note to students: please remember do not select a financial institution for your company.

For PowerPoints items in Sections 1 & 2 should be 1 slide each. For section 3 it’s your call. Cover those important ratios and significant issues found in the common-sized income statement and in your analysis of the capital structure of the firm. Remember however that PowerPoint slides are not meant to be an eye chart. If you have more than 6 typed lines on one slide – you needed another slide!

I. Introduction

II. Firm, Industry and Environment(please bebrief,this IS a finance and accounting course not a history class!)

  1. Description of firm and its management
  2. Discussion of the competitive environment
  3. Economic climate and outlook
  4. Other factors as appropriate, e.g. governmental regulations, labor issues, litigation pending

II. Evaluation of Financial Statements (note key word is “evaluation”)

  1. Overview
  2. Short-term liquidity
  3. Activity Ratios
  4. Financial Leverage (Debt Ratios)
  5. Profitability and Market Ratios
  6. Common-sized Income Statement Analysis (this means compare one year to another)
  7. Discussion of the Company’s capital structure

III. Outlook,

  • Summary and Conclusions
    1. Outlook for performance (investment potential, credit assessment, etc.)
    2. Strengths
    3. Weaknesses
    4. Summary and Conclusions

    **Your final submission must be a PowerPoint presentation – use as many slides as necessary but please don’t get carried away. Also, remember that PowerPoints are not meant to be “paragraph after paragraph” of writing, but rather the highlights of your findings which will be mostly in bullet-point format. You may need to explain some of your findings in more detail of course and I am looking for an analysis that would include the “so what” of your findings.

    ** PLEASE INCLUDE SCRIPT WITHIN SLIDE**

    IMPORTANT! Be sure to give credit to any source you use. While this is not an APA exercise, the rules for plagiarism definitely apply.

    Part 2: You are to review/critique/analyze one other PowerPoint presentation. You may ask questions of the presenter, add additional information concerning the company and its performance the presenter may have omitted, or take issue with the presenter concerning any item of the presentation including the presenter’s analysis and conclusions. You comments – posted under the presentation you are evaluating is due no later than Sunday of week 6 at 11:59pm. Should a classmate comment on your presentation, ask questions of you or challenge your analysis or conclusions, you will have until the following Wednesday (week 7) to reply. Note your analysis/critique of one other presentation is part of your grade. (3-4 sentence reply)

    Below are two course projects turned in by different students in a past course – one is very good the other is NOT – so this gives you some guidance on what to do and, just as important, what not to do.

    Watch both and then ask yourself which of the two presentations actually told me something about the FINANCES of the company. Both look pretty, but this “ain’t” an art class.

    As for Michele’s – she did a voice-over Powerpoint presentation. I am NOT requiring anyone to do a voice -over, actually I’d prefer that you don’t, but here I think it’s very useful as you can easily follow her analysis

    I thought some examples would be helpful.

    FIN 306 Course Project Grading Rubric
    Organization
    20 to >18.2 pts
    18.2 to >16.5 pts
    16.5 to >14.6 pts
    14.6 to >13 pts
    13 to >0 pts
    Distinguished
    Proficient
    Satisfactory
    Marginal
    Unsatisfactory
    Followed template
    exactly – all topics
    covered.
    Followed template – with
    minor modifications topics covered
    Followed template in Some attempt to
    general – most topics follow template covered
    items missing
    20 to >18.2 pts
    18.2 to >16.5 pts
    16.5 to >14.6 pts
    14.6 to >13 pts
    Distinguished
    Proficient
    Satisfactory
    Marginal
    Did not follow template
    – missed important
    topics
    13 to >0 pts
    Demonstrates
    Demonstrated good
    Limited command
    Presentation of Data complete command of command of ratios and
    of ratios and/or
    ratios and common
    common-sized IS. May
    common sized IS.
    size tools. Cross
    have minor math errors. Math errors.
    sectional analysis
    Used both time series and Incomplete crosscomplete.
    cross sectional analysis.
    sectional analysis
    20 to >18.2 pts
    Distinguished
    Evaluation
    S&W
    Recommendation
    Unsatisfactory
    Some ratios either
    missing or incorrectly Key ratios and/or
    calculated. Common common sized IS
    sized IS incomplete. missing. Major math
    errors. Lack of
    Lack of crossunderstanding of
    sectional analysis
    topics evident
    18.2 to >16.5 pts
    16.5 to >14.6 pts
    14.6 to >13 pts
    13 to >0 pts
    Proficient
    Satisfactory
    Marginal
    Unsatisfactory
    Makes appropriate Provides appropriate but Connections between Makes no connection
    Makes thoughtful
    connections
    vague connections
    financial topics lacking. between financial
    connections between
    between financial between financial topics. Lack of critical thinking topics. Ratios calculated
    financial tools.
    tools. Presents
    Presentation shows
    evident. Evaluation
    but are left alone – no
    Demonstrates
    good command of some lack of
    lacks support or
    attempt to relate one to
    command of topics.
    topics.
    understanding of topics. financial evidence.
    another
    20 to >18.2 pts
    18.2 to >16.5 pts
    16.5 to >14.6 pts
    14.6 to >13 pts
    FIN 306 Course Project Grading Rubric
    Distinguished
    Proficient
    S&W: clear, logical
    S&W: connected
    connections with data logically to data
    analysis.
    analysis.
    Recommendations
    Recommendations
    thoughtful – flow from appropriate.
    analysis.
    20 to >18.2 pts
    Distinguished
    Professional
    Presentation/Writing presentation commands
    attention. Writing
    clear and concise error free.
    Total Points: 100
    18.2 to >16.5 pts
    Proficient
    Professional
    presentation.
    Writing appropriate
    for audience. Few,
    minor grammatical
    errors.
    Satisfactory
    Marginal
    13 to >0 pts
    S&W: lack
    S&W not focused on Unsatisfactory
    consistency with data data.
    Makes no connection
    analysis.
    Recommendations
    between S&W and
    Recommendations vague or unrealistic.
    data/analysis.
    reasonable overall.
    Recommendations
    unrealistic or
    inappropriate given data
    presented.
    Recommendations not
    related to data
    16.5 to >14.6 pts
    Satisfactory
    Presentation
    acceptable – meets
    expectations. May
    have a few
    grammatical errors.
    Writing may be
    wordy.
    14.6 to >13 pts
    Marginal
    13 to >0 pts
    Unsatisfactory
    Presentation not
    Acceptable yet flawed
    professional presentations – lacks
    haphazard – difficult to
    some professional
    follow. Errors in
    elements. May have
    grammar distract from
    grammatical errors.
    presentation
    Walmart Financial Analysis
    Introduction
    • Founded by Sam Walton in Rogers, Arkansas in 1962
    • Walmart is broken down into three divisions:
    • Sam’s Club
    • Walmart International
    • Walmart U.S.
    • By 1990 Walmart had become the largest U.S. retailer
    • Became the largest corporation in the world in 2001
    • Began expanding into the e-commerce world in the 2010’s with the purchase of
    startups such as Jet.com and Moosejaw
    • What does Walmart Provide?
    • Walmart’s mission statement is “Save people money so they can live better”
    • Provides a variety of goods and services at discounted prices including:
    • Gas, Groceries, Wireless services, Pharmaceutical services, and plenty of other things
    • As of 2019 Walmart has over 4,700 different store locations in the U.S.A. and continues to
    expand overseas
    • Management’s Core Values
    • Customer First
    • Accountable
    • Frontline focused
    • Honesty
    Competitive Environment
    • Walmart has a unique competitive environment for a couple of
    reasons
    • Competitors in the discount retail industry
    • Target
    • Costco
    • Walmart’s biggest competitors come from the e-commerce industry
    Huge Growth Potential in the E-Commerce Industry
    • Walmart is a Multi-Billion Dollar corporation that has long been atop
    the retail industry and has since expanded into e-commerce
    • The biggest competitors in terms of revenues are:
    • Amazon
    • Alibaba
    • E-commerce has grown to 15% of the total retail market share
    • The next step for Walmart is to become the top e-commerce retailer
    Walmart’s Place Among its Peers
    • Walmart ranks 11th in in brand value($67.867 billion) out of all the
    brands in the world
    • Amazon ranks 1st ($187.905 billion)
    • Net global sales have grown considerably over the last couple years
    • Up 2.9% over the last fiscal year
    • A large majority of Walmart’s sales come from groceries do to their
    adaption of online ordering and curbside pickup
    Short-Term Liquidity
    Comparing Walmart’s and Amazon’s short-term liquidity
    • Walmart has a lower current ratio than Amazon, but it is right in line with the industry average. A lower
    current ratio is fine for Walmart for a couple reasons:
    • Walmart is extremely large and has thousands of stores around the world
    • Most of their current assets are tied up in inventory which is good because of their high inventory
    turnover rate
    • Amazon’s current ratio is higher because they do not need to keep as high of an inventory and have less
    debt wrapped up in property
    Quick Ratio
    • Walmart’s quick ratio is much lower than Amazon’s because Walmart must keep a much higher inventory
    • Expect Walmart’s quick ratio to start trending upwards as they continue expanding into the ecommerce industry
    Activity Ratios
    Notable Differences
    • Average collection period: Amazon > Walmart
    • Total Asset turnover : Walmart > Amazon
    What to Expect in the Future
    • Average collection period for both will go towards
    each other, since they are invading each others’
    markets
    • Walmart will always have a higher asset turnover
    due to its business structure
    E-commerce effect on average collection period
    • Transactions are done online via credit card
    • More cash transactions = less collection time
    Inventory Turnover
    • Ratio’s are close, but Walmart’s inventory takes up
    72% of their current assets while Amazons
    inventory takes up 22% of their current assets
    • Shows why Walmart’s quick ratio is so much lower
    than Amazon’s
    Debt Ratios
    Walmart
    Amazon
    12/31/18
    12/31/17
    • Debt Ratios
    • Both are on the higher side
    • Walmart’s debt ratio is trending up
    • Amazon’s higher debt ratio is
    related to its low amount of equity
    12/31/16
    1/31/19
    1/31/18
    1/31/17
    • Debt-to-equity Ratio
    • Multiple ways to calculate
    • Spike in D-T-E ratio indicates expansion/growth
    • Neither company has preferred stock
    • Times interest Earned Ratio
    • Both companies are doing very well with this ratio
    • Amazon’s downward trend happened during a year of
    enormous growth
    Profitability and Market Ratios
    Profitability Ratios Walmart
    1/31/19
    1/31/18
    Profitability Ratios Amazon
    1/31/17
    12/31/18
    12/31/17
    12/31/16
    Gross Profit Margin
    25.10%
    25.37%
    25.65%
    Gross Profit Margin
    40.25%
    37.07%
    35.09%
    Operating Profit Margin
    4.27%
    4.08%
    4.69%
    Operating Profit Margin
    5.33%
    2.31%
    3.08%
    Net Profit Margin
    1.30%
    1.97%
    2.81%
    Net Profit Margin
    4.32%
    1.71%
    1.81%
    Earnings Per Share
    $
    $ 2.26
    3.28
    $
    4.38
    Earnings Per Share
    $
    $
    20.14
    6.15
    $
    4.90
    Return on Total Assets
    3.05%
    4.82%
    6.86%
    Return on Total Assets
    6.19%
    2.31%
    2.96%
    Return on Equity
    8.39%
    12.19%
    16.94%
    Return on Equity
    22.70%
    10.71%
    18.23%
    Market Ratios
    Market Ratios
    P/E Ratio
    M/B Ratio
    Market Price Per share
    Book Value per share
    42.03
    $
    $
    3.50
    95.83 $
    27.41 $
    32.40
    15.17
    3.91
    106.60
    27.28
    2.66
    $
    $
    66.74
    25.10
    P/E Ratio
    M/B Ratio
    74.58
    190.16
    17.24
    153.03
    20.81
    18.43
    Income Statement Analysis
    Outlook
    • Walmart had a down year
    • Still a good investment, lots of growth potential
    • Must improve financial leverage
    • Low risk low reward (conservative stock)
    • Ratios are in good shape
    • Amazon took a huge step forward
    • Expect their growth level out a bit
    • Low risk stock with high upside
    • Can possibly take over as top retailer in terms of revenues
    Walmart’s Capital Structure
    • Debt Capital
    • Long-term capital lease obligations and long-term debt total equal $50.203 billion
    • Equity Capital
    • 2.994 billion capital in excess of par paid on common stock(288 million shares outstanding) and retained earnings totals
    $83.779 billion less accumulated comprehensive loss of $11.542 billion
    • Total Stockholders’ equity: $72.496 billion
    • Total Capital Structure: $122.699 billion; 41% from Debt & 59% from Equity
    • 4.1% comes from common stock 54.9% comes from retained earnings
    Amazon’s Capital Structure
    • Debt Capital
    • Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities totals : $50.708 billion
    • Equity Capital
    • 500 million shares outstanding of common stock and additional paid in capital totals: $26.796 billion and retained earnings totals $19.625
    billion; less: treasury stock ($1.837 billion) and accumulated losses($1.035 billion)
    • Total Stockholders Equity: $43.549 billion
    • Total Capital Structure: $94.257 billion; 53.8% comes from Debt & 46.2% comes from Equity
    • 28.4% comes from common stock and 17.8% comes from retained earnings
    Strengths
    • Larger company (Higher Revenues)
    • High inventory turnover rates
    • Investors have confidence
    • Low cost of capital (not much
    common stock equity used)
    • Large market share
    • Brand recognition
    • Understanding that the market is
    changing
    Weaknesses
    • Financial leverage
    • Declining profit margin
    • Sources of capital are unbalanced
    • E-commerce
    • Heightened competition
    • Unforeseen losses
    • Extinguishment of debt
    • Other (gains) and losses
    Summary and Conclusion
    • Walmart has its work cut out for them if they expect to maintain or
    increase their share of the market from Amazon. Amazon is ahead of
    the curve when it comes to adapting to the changing market, but
    Walmart has at least been attempting to keep pace.
    • Putting pressure on their competitors is something that Walmart
    must keep doing. Continuing their expansion into e-commerce while
    at the same time retain their profits generated from brick and mortar
    stores is key.
    • The retail industry has been dominated by Walmart for years, and I
    have no reason to believe they would let anyone change that
    Walmart. “Form 10-K.” SEC Archives, 2019,
    www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/104169/000010416919000016/wmtform10kx1312019.htm#s6EB4B4E54DED54A7BC64CAC319ACC3EA.
    Citations
    Amazon. “Form 10-K” SEC Archives, 2019,https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000101872419000004/amzn20181231x10k.htm#s292EB9EA1A9C5F7E944E30FEBED45ABB
    Walmart Inc. (WMT) Income Statement. (2019, December 4). Retrieved December 2, 2019, from
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/WMT/financials?p=WMT.
    Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Income Statement. (2019, December 5). Retrieved December 4, 2019, from
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AMZN/financials?p=AMZN.
    Walmart Income Statement 2005-2019: WMT. (2019). Retrieved December 4, 2019, from
    https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/WMT/walmart/income-statement.
    Amazon Income Statement 2005-2019: AMZN. (2019). Retrieved December 4, 2019, from
    https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/income-statement
    Tikkanen, A. (2019, March 4). Walmart. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Walmart.
    . Msa. (2019, October 11). Walmart Mission Statement 2019: Walmart Mission & Vision Analysis. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from
    https://mission-statement.com/walmart/.
    Duncan, E. (n.d.). Topic: Walmart. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from
    https://www.statista.com/topics/1451/walmart/.
    Amazon Net Profit Margin 2006-2019: AMZN. (2019). Retrieved December 5, 2019, from
    https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/net-profit-margin.
    Appendix
    Appendix
    DELL
    Michelle Fleming
    DELL
    • American multinational computer technology corporation
    • Intense competitive environment
    • Many merges and acquisitions have given competitors advantages
    • Foreign competitors are penetrating free markets
    • Poor economic climate has only slightly negatively affected Dell
    • Government’s focus on electronic waste may affect Dell’s costs
    Financial Source
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
    Assets
    Financial Source
    Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
    SHORT TERM LIQUIDITY
    HP Financial Source
    ACTIVITY RATIOS
    HP Financial Source
    FINANCIAL LEVERAGE
    HP Financial Source
    PROFITABILITY RATIOS
    HP Financial Source
    MARKET RATIOS
    HP Financial Source
    COMMON-SIZED INCOME STATEMENT
    Financial Source
    CAPITAL STRUCTURE
    • Long-term borrowing cannot be used to finance operations
    indefinitely
    • Debt as a proportion of total assets and equity was relatively
    stable
    DELL
    Strengths
    Weaknesses

    Decreased debt ratio

    Unpredictable average payment period

    Investors willing to pay more for Dell

    Increased long-term debt

    Increased profitability ratios
    RECOMMEND TO INVEST IN DELL
    • Increased Revenue
    • Assets covering debts
    • Favorable investment potential
    AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT NOT TO DO!

    This presentation might look pretty – but – it deserves an “F” ! Why? If you already
    looked at Michelle’s you already know – if not: this is a financial analysis assignment.
    The problem with this presentation (and, yes, it was an actual project) is there isn’t any
    analysis! Can you tell my how well or poorly Ford is doing based upon this presentation?

    I didn’t think so. Neither could I.
    PURPOSE
    • To show the financial stability and growth potential of Ford.
    • To provide information for investment
    • To provide a comparison of Ford and Chevrolet for investors
    BRIEF HISTORY

    15 July 1903: Ford makes first sale

    1922 Ford buys Lincoln brand

    Ford played a major role in developing and operating NASA’s Mission Control Center for
    the Gemini and Apollo space programs

    During World War I Ford built 60 Eagle Boats ( Submarine Chasers)

    During WWII Ford Built more than 8600 B-24 Liberator Bombers

    In 1914 Ford doubled wages to $5 dollars a day. This helped build the U.S. middle class

    Ford is currently one of the top 100 Global Innovators on Thomson Reuters List
    MANAGEMENT MISSION AND GOAL
    THE FUTURE OF THE AUTO INDUSTRY

    Ford’s business strategy is embodied in our ONE Ford plan. ONE Ford expands on our
    Company’s four-point business plan for achieving success globally. The four-point business
    plan consists of the following:

    Aggressively restructure to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix.

    Accelerate development of new products our customers want and value.

    Finance our plan and improve our balance sheet.

    Work together effectively as one team.

    Building on this plan, ONE Ford encourages focus, teamwork and a single global approach,
    aligning employee efforts toward a common definition of success. It emphasizes the importance
    of working together as one team to achieve automotive leadership, which is measured by the
    satisfaction of our customers, employees and essential business partners, such as our dealers,
    investors, suppliers, unions/councils and the communities in which we operate. We have
    defined a set of behaviors that are expected of all employees to support the ONE Ford plan.
    FUTURE CONT’D

    The goal of ONE Ford is to create an exciting and viable company with profitable growth for all. The output
    of ONE Ford is:

    Great Products, defined as those that are high quality, green, safe and smart.

    Strong Business, based on a balanced portfolio of products and global presence; and

    Better World, accomplished through our sustainability strategy.

    As detailed in the Financial Health section, Ford has made a remarkable turnaround over the last several
    years, fueled by disciplined adherence to the ONE Ford plan and resulting in the reinvention of our
    Company as a highly competitive force in the global automotive industry.

    Looking ahead, industry-wide vehicle sales are expected to rise significantly in the next few years, driven by
    accelerated expansion in developing markets, recovery in mature markets and sales of smaller and more
    fuel-efficient vehicles. We expect our sales to increase to about 8 million units by mid-decade, up about 50
    percent from 5.3 million units in 2010. By 2020, nearly one-third of our sales will come from the fast-growing
    Asia Pacific and Africa region, more than doubling the current percentage of global sales volume we achieve
    in that region.
    INCOME STATEMENT
    2011/2012

    3rd quarter Total Revenue-132.4B
    • Net Income- 17.68B
    • Cash Flow- Financing 4.591B
    • From Investing- -16.66B
    • From Operations- 9.171B
    BALANCE SHEET
    • Cash- 35.54B
    • Long Term Debt- 100.60B
    • Total Assets- 184.68B
    • Liabilities- 165.79B
    • Shareholders Equity- 18.89B
    RATIOS
    • Current Ratio
    • Total liabilities/ Total
    Assets
    • 1.911
    Debt to Equity
    Ratio
    5.327
    COMPETITION
    • Ford
    Chevrolet
    • Did not take gov’t bail out
    Took tax payer money to avoid
    bankruptcy
    • Market Cap- 42.34B
    • Current Stock Price $11.01
    per share
    • Current Volume- 1,410,000
    Market cap- 38.54B
    Current Stock Price- $24.61
    Current Volume- 9,661,308
    CONCLUSION
    • Ford has always been an American Company and a
    success story
    • Through continuing innovation and engineering Ford is
    increasing its market
    • Good investment for the long run. Steady movement.
    • Using Green technology is a positive in today’s world.
    CONCLUSION CONT’D
    • When compared to other manufacturers there is a lot of
    competition out there.
    • Other companies are sprinting toward technology and eco
    friendly break through as well
    • Through a good plan and hard working people this company will
    be around for many years to come.
    • Good Credit and no tax payer funds makes a good argument as
    well.
    RESOURCES

    http://corporate.ford.com/

    www.gm.com/company/investors/sec-filiings.html

    www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock

    Finance.yahoo.com

    Place your order
    (550 words)

    Approximate price: $22

    Calculate the price of your order

    550 words
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
    Total price:
    $26
    The price is based on these factors:
    Academic level
    Number of pages
    Urgency
    Basic features
    • Free title page and bibliography
    • Unlimited revisions
    • Plagiarism-free guarantee
    • Money-back guarantee
    • 24/7 support
    On-demand options
    • Writer’s samples
    • Part-by-part delivery
    • Overnight delivery
    • Copies of used sources
    • Expert Proofreading
    Paper format
    • 275 words per page
    • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
    • Double line spacing
    • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

    Our guarantees

    Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
    That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

    Money-back guarantee

    You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

    Read more

    Zero-plagiarism guarantee

    Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

    Read more

    Free-revision policy

    Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

    Read more

    Privacy policy

    Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

    Read more

    Fair-cooperation guarantee

    By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

    Read more

    Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP